REF NO.: 108
|SUBJECT:||Memorial University business professors say lack of training a concern|
|DATE:||Jan. 26, 2012|
New research from Memorials Faculty of Business Administration shows nearly 50 per cent of workers do not have access to employer-sponsored training. The research also shows that it is often low-skilled workers with poor prospects in todays economy who are excluded from training opportunities trends with worrying implications for Canadas long-term competitiveness.
In addition to workers not offered training, a further 16 per cent or one in six of those offered training do not take full advantage of the opportunities.
These are some of the findings revealed in the article Declining Versus Participating in Employer-Supported Training in Canada, published in the current issue of the International Journal of Training and Development. (www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=1360-3736&site=1)
Training is key for marginalized workers to upgrade skills and improve their plight, so it is important to define and understand which workers have the chance to take training, whether or not they do so, and why, said Dr. Gordon Cooke, associate professor, industrial relations, Memorial Universitys Faculty of Business Administration. This is a first step for more targeted public policy responses to boost training availability and uptake.
The research is significant, the authors argue, because it indicates that there are barriers preventing Canadian workers from bettering their skills and employment outcomes a trend which, if it continues, will impact Canadas global competitiveness.
The research by Dr. Cooke, James Chowhan, PhD candidate, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, and Dr. Travor Brown, professor, labour relations and human resources, Memorial University, uses data from a Statistics Canada 2005 Workplace and Employee Survey (WEB) to determine which workers have access to employer-supported training and who takes advantage of training opportunities. The authors classified workers into four categories: takers, who take all training offered; choosers, who take some and decline some training; decliners, who decline all training; and excluded, those not offered training.
It is the latter two categories with which we are most concerned, Dr. Cooke said.
Women, older workers, less educated workers and employees of very small, small and medium-sized businesses were substantially more prevalent in the excluded category, while most of the choosers and takers were highly-educated managers and professionals likely secure in their occupations.
The researchers hope the empirical findings and the conceptual framework they use for this research stimulates additional research to investigate why training is declined and to find ways to make training more accessible in Canada and in other jurisdictions as well.
If, for instance, workers decline training solely due to logistical hurdles family issues or an inability to access training during work hours, then remedies to boost training levels at a corporate and national level can be designed, said Dr. Cooke.
We know that training is key to improving peoples employment outcomes, but it is not just good for individual workers. A highly trained national workforce benefits employers and society in general, so we may find that the government needs to play a more hands on role in labour market policy.
- 30 -
For more information, please contact Moira Finn, communications co-ordinator, Memorial University, Faculty of Business Administration, at firstname.lastname@example.org or