Genetics versus "Reverse Genetics":
Genetics and molecular
biology
of Alkaptonuria,
an inborn error of metabolism:
Archibald
Garrod in 1902 observed the "Black
Urine Disease" in
his patients (Step 1)
. From the pattern of
inheritance (pedigree)
observed in families under his care
(Step 2), he deduced that
the disease was
inherited as a simple recessive trait, in
the manner described by Mendel,
whose work at the time had been recently rediscovered.
Chemical analysis of their urine suggested a biochemical
basis, that the disease was caused by build-up of the
substance alkapton
(Step 3). Garrod had no
knowledge of the biochemical nature of genes. [We now call
alkapton homogentistic acid.]
Subsequent
investigation mapped the gene to a physical location (locus) in a particular
band on the long arm of
Chromosome 3 (3q2)
(Step 4). Isolation of the gene
in another organism (Steps 5-7) provided molecular probes to further
localize the gene
to a small region within the 3q2
band (Steps 8 & 9). Detailed analysis of the region
shows
that the enzyme defects are due to specific mutations in particular exons (Step 10). On
investigation,
some members of the families studied have an unusual
phenotype, "Black
Urine Disease." DNA
sequencing
of those individuals in
a pedigree similar to those studied by Garrod demonstrates
that parents
and offspring have the expected phenotypes
for their observed genotypes.
Garrod's analysis is classical Genetics: he
observed
the pattern of inheritance of the phenotype
in order to infer the the nature of the biochemical genotype. The molecular
analysis is
"reverse Genetics":
detailed
study of the gene locus genotype
predicts
how it produces a disease phenotype.
Homework:
Explain the connection between Steps 10 & 11 in detail:
How do the
alleles identified
in Step 10
result in the phenotypes
shown
in Step 11

Archibald Garrod (ca. 1908)
Figures
©2002
by Griffiths et al.; All text material
©2011
by Steven M. Carr