2004 - 2005 Calendar
University Regulations
11 Academic Misconduct
11.1 Principles
11.2 General Information
11.3 General Procedure
11.4 Academic Offences
11.5 Procedures for Informal Resolution of Alleged Academic
Offences
11.6 Procedures for Formal Resolution of Alleged Academic
Offences
11.7 Transcript Entries Related to Penalties
11.8 Disposition of Documentation
11.1 Principles
Within the University community there is a collective responsibility to
maintain a high level of scholarly integrity. Students are expected to adhere
to those principles which constitute proper academic conduct. Academic misconduct
cannot be condoned or even appear to be condoned. Students have the responsibility
to know which actions, as described under Academic Offences, could be construed
as dishonest or improper. Students are reminded that for further guidance
on proper scholarly behaviour they should seek advice from their instructors
and faculty advisors.
11.2 General Information
11.2.1 These procedures shall apply to all academic offences
relating to undergraduate studies involving, but not limited to, those students
who either have been or who are enrolled at Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Notification of an allegation of academic misconduct will be forwarded to
the last known mailing address of the student as noted on the files at the
Office of the Registrar. The University reserves the right to implement
action under these procedures where an allegation has been made against a
student but where reasonable efforts to contact the student are unsuccessful.
11.2.2 A student who wishes to attend classes, laboratories
or other educational activities while an investigation under these procedures
is being carried out, can do so only with the written permission of the academic
unit concerned. This provision excludes students charged with an offence
under the Code Of Disciplinary Procedures For Students. For information
regarding theCode Of Disciplinary Procedures For Students contact
the Office of Student Affairs and Services.
11.2.3 While a student can continue in a program of studies,
if eligible, while an investigation under these procedures is being carried
out, the University does not accept liability for any consequences to the
student's progress. However, the University may take these consequences into
account, as appropriate and to the extent feasible, in cases where charges
are dropped or the student is not found guilty. The consequences arising
from an investigation and any negative decision rendered may include retroactive
effect on grades or promotion within a program.
11.3 General Procedure
11.3.1 When a member of the University community (faculty,
staff, student) has grounds for belief that an academic offence has been
committed, that person shall report the matter without delay to the head of
the appropriate academic or administrative unit. There should then be an
attempt between the parties concerned to resolve minor offences. Only if
resolution proves impossible, or one party is dissatisfied with the resolution,
should the head of the academic or administrative unit become further involved.
11.3.2 If, in the judgment of the head of the academic
or administrative unit, the offence warrants resolution through informal
procedures, the individuals involved will be advised to attempt to resolve
the matter through Procedures for Informal Resolution
of Alleged Academic Offences. In the event that no resolution
is possible through informal procedures between the individual parties, the
head of the academic or administrative unit will institute formal proceedings.
11.3.3 If, in the judgement of the head of the academic
or administrative unit, the alleged offence against University regulations
is such as to warrant resolution through formal procedures, the head of the
academic or administrative unit will refer the matter to the chair of the
appropriate committee on undergraduate studies, and Procedures for Formal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences
will be implemented.
11.3.4 In all cases, it is the responsibility of the
academic or administrative unit to ensure that fairness and impartiality
are achieved in the treatment of students.
11.4 Academic Offences
11.4.1 In the following section the plural shall be deemed
to include the singular.
11.4.2 Academic offences shall be deemed to include,
but shall not be limited to, the following:
- Cheating on examinations or any other tests, theses, assignments,
work term reports, projects or internship reports: includes copying from
another student's work or allowing another student to copy from one's own
work; consulting with any unauthorized person during an examination or test;
using unauthorized aids; or knowingly recording or reporting false empirical
or statistical data. The work referred to includes examinations, theses,
assignments, work term reports, projects, internship reports, or any other
tests which are to be used in judging the student's performance in a course
or program of study, or on any special tests which the University may offer.
- Impersonating another student or allowing oneself to be impersonated:
includes the imitation of a student or the entrance into an arrangement with
another person to be impersonated for the purposes of taking examinations
or tests or carrying out laboratory or other assignments.
- Plagiarism: is the act of presenting the ideas or works of another
as one's own. This applies to all material such as essays, laboratory reports,
work term reports, design projects, seminar presentations, statistical data,
computer programs and research results. The properly acknowledged use of
sources is an accepted and important part of scholarship. Use of such material
without acknowledgment is contrary to accepted norms of academic behaviour.
Information regarding acceptable writing practices is available through
the Writing Centre.
- Theft of examination papers or other material: includes obtaining
by any improper means examination papers, tests, or any other such material.
- Use and/or distribution of stolen material: includes
the use of material which the student knows to have been improperly obtained
and/or the distribution of such material is considered to be an academic
offence.
- Submitting false information: includes falsifying
academic forms or records, submitting false credentials, medical or other
certificates, or making a false, misleading or incomplete declaration to
the University.
- Submitting work for one course or work term which has been or is
being submitted for another course or work term at this or any other institution
without express permission to do so: includes the presentation
of an essay, report or assignment to satisfy some or all of the requirements
of a course when that essay, report, or assignment has been previously submitted
or is concurrently being submitted for another course without the express
permission of the professor(s) involved.
11.5 Procedures
for Informal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences
11.5.1 General Information
These procedures will not be applied to cases involving alleged offences
on final examinations. Alleged offences on final examinations are governed
by the Procedures for Formal Resolution of Alleged
Academic Offences.
11.5.2 Explanation of Procedures
If, upon receiving a report of an alleged academic offence, the head of
the academic or administrative unit decides that an attempt should be made
to resolve the matter informally the following procedures shall apply:
- The head of the appropriate academic or administrative unit shall
request a meeting with the accuser and the accused and at the meeting the
head shall state the allegation, review theProcedures
for Informal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences including
the range of applicable penalties, and arrange a second meeting between
the accuser and the accused only.
- At the second meeting the accuser and accused shall endeavor to obtain
a mutually satisfactory resolution of the matter.
- The accuser and accused shall report jointly to the head of the academic
or administrative unit on the result of their second meeting.
- If the report is of a resolution which the head of the academic or
administrative unit considers to be fair and equitable the matter shall be
considered closed. If the head of the academic or administrative unit considers
the reported resolution to be unfair and/or inequitable he or she will endeavor
to obtain an alternative satisfactory resolution directly with the parties.
- Should all reasonable efforts to obtain an informal resolution fail,
the head of the academic or administrative unit will refer the case to the
chair of the appropriate committee on undergraduate studies and shall inform
the accuser and the accused accordingly. From this stage onward Procedures for Formal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences
will apply.
- A student may request, during the Procedures
for Informal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences, that
his or her case be referred to the chair of the appropriate committee on
undergraduate studies, and thereafter the Procedures
for Formal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences will apply.
11.5.3 Failure to Appear or Respond
11.5.4 Penalties in the Case of Informal Resolution
A student who has been found guilty of an academic offence will be subject
to a penalty or penalties commensurate with the offence. Some cases may warrant
more than one penalty for the same offence, and previous academic misconduct
will be taken into account in determining penalties. The range of penalties
and their determination are:
- Reprimand: will be in the nature of a warning by the head of the
academic or administrative unit or the appropriate committee to the student
that the student's behaviour has been unacceptable to the University.
- Reduction of grade: will apply to an examination, test, or assignment
to which an offence is relevant, and will be decided by the head of the academic
or administrative unit.
11.6 Procedures
for Formal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences
11.6.1 General Information
If the matter cannot be resolved following the Procedures for Informal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences,
or if, in the opinion of the head of the appropriate academic or administrative
unit, the allegation involves a major breach of University regulations, or
in the case of alleged offences on final examinations, the following Procedures
for Formal Resolution of Alleged Academic Offences shall apply.
11.6.2 Explanation of Procedures
- If the head of the academic or administrative unit (in the case of
departmentalized faculties, the head in consultation with the dean) is satisfied
that the student has a serious allegation to answer, that person shall inform
the student in writing of the nature of the allegation against him or her.
In addition, the head of the academic or administrative unit shall report
to the chair of the appropriate faculty committee on undergraduate studies
who will interview separately the accuser, the accused and relevant witnesses.
At these interviews the chair of the appropriate committee on undergraduate
studies, the accuser, the accused and relevant witnesses all have the right
to be accompanied by a registered student or a member of the faculty or staff
of the University. The Memorial University of Newfoundland Student Union
(MUNSU) and the Sir Wilfred Grenfell College Council of the Students' Union
(SWGC CSU) will provide students with information on their legal rights.
- Upon completion of these interviews, the faculty chair shall submit
a written report of all findings to the Secretary, Senate Committee on Undergraduate
Studies, c/o Office of the Registrar.
- The Secretary of the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies shall
present this report to both the accuser and accused for perusal and comment.
Once in receipt of this report, the accuser and accused shall have two weeks
in which to submit to the Secretary, Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
any additional comments on the report that the person wishes to be considered
in the deliberations of the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies.
- The Secretary of the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies shall
present to the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies for decision all
information received from the chair of the appropriate Committee on Undergraduate
Studies as well as comments from the accuser and accused. The chair who submitted
the written report shall remain at the meeting held to consider the case
to answer questions raised by the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies
and to provide information pertinent to the case, but shall be absent from
the voting process.
- The Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies shall take appropriate
action in accordance with Penalties in the Case of Formal Resolution.
11.6.3 Failure to Appear or Respond
11.6.4 Penalties in the Case of
Formal Resolution
A student who has been found guilty of an academic offence will be subject
to a penalty or penalties commensurate with the offence. Some cases may warrant
more than one penalty for the same offence, and previous academic misconduct
will be taken into account in determining penalties. Enforcement of penalties
resulting from Procedures for Formal Resolution
of Alleged Academic Offences will be overseen by the Registrar.
The range of penalties and their determination is:
- Reprimand: shall be in the nature of a warning by the head of the
academic or administrative unit or the appropriate committee to the student
that the student's behaviour has been unacceptable to the University.
- Reduction of grade: will apply to an examination, test, or assignment
to which an offence is relevant, and will be decided by the Senate Committee
on Undergraduate Studies upon the recommendation of the appropriate academic
or administrative unit.
- Probation: the period of probation will be determined by the Senate
Committee on Undergraduate Studies. The impact of being placed on probation
is that the commission of any further academic offence during the period
of probation may lead to suspension or expulsion.
- Suspension: will apply to a course, department, faculty, school,
or the University. The period of suspension will be determined by the Senate
Committee on Undergraduate Studies and shall not exceed six consecutive semesters.
- Expulsion: the recommendation for expulsion from the University will
be made by the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies to the President
of the University for a final decision. Prior to the President's decision,
the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies will notify the accused, in
writing, of the recommendation for expulsion from the University. The accused
will be allowed a period of two weeks following the date of release of such
notification to lodge an appeal before the President's final decision concerning
expulsion from the University. Any such appeal should be made in writing
to the Executive Committee of Senate, c/o the Office of the Registrar.
11.7 Transcript Entries Related to Penalties
11.7.1 Transcript entries shall relate to the penalty(ies)
imposed as follows:
| Penalty |
Transcript Entry
|
| Reprimand |
No transcript entry |
| Reduction of Grade |
Entry of final grade for course |
| Probation |
"On probation at the University for academic misconduct
until [Day, Month, Year]" |
| Suspension |
"Suspended from the University/Faculty/School/Program/Course
for academic misconduct until [Day, Month, Year]" |
| Expulsion |
"Expelled from the University for academic misconduct
effective [Day, Month, Year]" |
11.7.2 The transcript entries for "probation" or "suspension"
will be removed entirely upon the expiration of the penalty.
11.8 Disposition of Documentation
11.8.1 The disposition of documents relating to allegations
under these procedures shall be as follows:
Last modified on April 30, 2004 by R. Bruce
Up to Calendar Table of Contents
Back to Office of the Registrar's Home Page