
Labour low-down
(September
7, 2000, Gazette)
By
Kelley Power
Each September, we pack our tents, blankets, bug repellent and
beer, scattering to cabins or campgrounds for the last long weekend
of the summer.
But, while
we may look forward to the Labour Day weekend, there is something
inherently final about it that cannot be ignored; the summer
is ending, the days are getting shorter and, most importantly,
we can kiss the relative warmth of summer goodbye. Frankly, I
find it depressing.
I decided
that I needed a distraction, not to mention a topic for my very
last column, and so did a little research about Labour Day and
the labour movement in general.
Since most
of us will probably have some contact with trade or labour unions
over the course of our careers, it struck me as being important
to understand how these organizations came about and how they
operate in todays society.
Perhaps some
of the earliest examples of organized labour appeared in the
form of merchant and craftsmens guilds. These associations
flourished in Europe between the 11th and 16th centuries, but
may have existed as early as ancient Roman times. They were formed
to provide their members with mutual aid and protection, as well
as to further their professional interests.
These associations
are credited with creating stable economic bases and governments
in the areas where they were active, as well as contributing
to road, school and church construction.
However,
internal politics, especially the division between wealthy and
poor guild members and the hereditary nature of apprenticeships,
eventually brought about the decline of these organizations.
The main
difference between these guilds and the labour unions of today
is that the guilds were designed to serve the interests of masters
and workers, while the objective of the later organizations was
to benefit workers alone.
Much of the
motivation for the modern labour movement arose from working
and living conditions during the Industrial Revolution. High
on the list of priorities was the limitation of child labour
and the shortening of the work day. Because Britain was the most
industrially advanced country up to the mid-19th century, much
of the ideals of the North American labour movement are based
on earlier British initiatives.
In the U.S.,
the first signs of a widespread organized labour movement came
in the early 1800s, although there was already some activity
at the local level. Canadas labour movement was a little
slower coming. The Toronto Trades Assembly, the first citywide
union, was not formed until 1871.
The labour
movements in the two countries would eventually become closely
intertwined. In fact, by the end of the 1880s, almost half of
the organized workers in Canada were members in unions headquartered
in the U.S.
Labour Day
was first celebrated on Sept. 5, 1882, in New York City in the
form of a demonstration and a picnic. However, there is evidence
that the concept originated in Canada. Apparently, the Toronto
Trades and Labour Council invited one of the founders of the
American Federation of Labour to a similar event in July of 1882.
Subsequently, this same gentleman announced a Labour Day celebration
for September in the U.S. Sounds suspiciously like idea thievery
to me.
Quebecs
labour history is unique in that the Roman Catholic church was
the driving force behind labour organization, vigorously promoting
it beginning around 1900. This was done in accordance with an
1891 papal decree that committed the Church to pursue the cause
of social justice, especially in relation to problems stemming
from the Industrial Revolution. The movement became secular after
Second World War. In all of North America, that type of labour
organization, confessional unionism, existed only in Quebec.
Between its
inception and now, the Canadian labour movement has undergone
several changes, some emerging from the depression of the 1930s,
others originating in post-world war times or during the womens
movement.
Over time,
issues of pay equity, job classification, collective bargaining,
adjudication of grievances, etc. were addressed and employers
adjusted. Its fair to say that labour unions were unquestionably
the primary force in developing the (predominantly) safe, just
and healthy work conditions we enjoy today.
Thats
a nice history lesson, but what about the position of labour
organizations today?
I think its
obvious that some unions may have lost sight of what the original
labour movement was trying to accomplish. Leading a labour union
today means power and money and, unfortunately, such things all
too often corrupt.
There is
no secret about the link between some labour leaders and mob
figures. The States are rampant with such reports. And remember
that some of these labour unions are international, meaning that
they have ties to other countries, including Canada.
In some cases,
membership is not optional, but required if a person wants to
work in a particular trade or establishment. More than one unionized
worker Ive talked to resents this policy and finds the
organization of labour a practice which has outlived its usefulness.
Id
have to say that I would never consider unions totally unnecessary.
After all, they act to safeguard what has already been achieved
for labourers, ensuring that employers cannot ignore the needs
of their employees. As well, they do much to further the cause
of equal rights for male and female labourers of all races and
sexual orientations.
Maybe there
just needs to be a redefinition of organized labours priorities
and objectives. We are, after all, living in the 21st century;
with about 150 having passed since their inception, it is completely
credible that unions would be in need of an overhaul.
As for Labour
Day, it stands as a celebration of working people and recognizes
the work of those who engineered the original labour movement.
Any controversy over labour unions should not detract from that.
So, enjoy your Labour Day weekends; if youve ever been
paid a wage, youve earned the right.
|