Bio4241 -
Midterm exam questions
Exam:
Wednesday, 29 February, 2-3P [1 hour exam]
Instructions:
1. Prepare answers for all of the
assigned midterm essay questions.
2. Your answer for each should fit
on the front and back of one
lined sheet of paper.
3. For the exam, I will select at
random four questions.
Answer any two of these.
(You may not answer the question pertaining to your own group's
presentation).
4. You may bring notes on your
prepared answers, on the front and back of one 8.5 x 11 sheet of
paper. [Please don't try
to cram complete essays onto this page!].
5. You will have one hour to
answer the two questions.
SMC1: What is a Gene? How would you define the concept "gene" in 2012? Compare and contrast your
definition with the “gene” as it was understood by the time of the
“cracking of the genetic code” ca. 1965.
SMC2: Suppose that the Luria &
Delbruck (1941) thought
experiment for the mutation hypothesis
[ http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/4241smc_Luria-Delbruck_TE2.html ]
were continued
for two more generations beyond what is shown, and that a mutation
occurs in one cell of culture #4 in the next-to-last generation.
Calculate the expected mean and variance among
cultures in the final generation, and the mutation rate.
Group 1. The Hershey & Chase
(1952) experiment is
often presented in an oversimplified manner in introductory
textbooks.
Identify at
least three oversimplifications in the illustration at [ http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/Hershey_Chase_Experiment2.html ].
Draw the graph
for the blender experiment [ http://www.biol4241.com/id75.html ] if the ideal result had been obtained.
Group 2. Sketch the expected ultracentrifuge
results from the Meselson & Stahl (1958) experiment [ http://www.biol4241.com/id102.html ]
if DNA replication were (1) conservative or (2) dispersive. Describe a specific mode for
dispersive replication.
If DNA were replicated
conservatively, predict the effect on Mendel’s Rules.
Group
3. Following up on the work of Garapin et al.
1978, Smith & Jones 2012 isolated the gene for
ovalbumin from the platypus. From a cDNA copy of the mRNA,
they did a set of restriction digests with the endonucleases A, B, & C,
singly and in pairwise combination: these data are show in the
left-hand box. They did the same digests on a clone of the genomic DNA (gDNA), and obtained the
results in the right-hand box.
1. How many introns are present?
What are their sizes?
2. Draw a restriction map that
locates the introns in the map of A B C
3. Draw the expected results when
the cDNA is annealed to
the gDNA
4. HINT: tba

Group
4: Refer to the summary of Table 3 in McClintock
1953 [http://biol4241.com/id124.html]. Explain how the concept of graded potential of Ac activator explains the
difference between the 1:1
and 6:1 experimental
ratios in the first block.
Group
5: King & Wilson
1975 used four types of data to estimate the genetic
similarity of chimps and humans. Summarize the calculations for protein
electrophoresis and show how number 99.18% similarity was obtained
from the data.
Group 6: Sanger et al. 1977 used cloned DNA, southern-blot probes,
auto-radiography, and PAGE to
determine the order of bases in DNA
sequences. Compare and
contrast these techniques with those used in current
dideoxy-based automated
sequencing machines.
Group 7: Jeffreys et al. 1985 included DNA "fingerprint" comparisons among sib-sib
and parent-offspring pairs. Because full sibs and
parent-offspring are both related by 0.5, they are expected to
share one-half of their alleles over a number of loci. Is it
possible to distinguish a mother-son
pair versus a brother-sister pair by DNA fingerprinting? Explain.
Consider a case where the mother has alleles AB at each of four loci (A1 / B1 through A4 / B4), and her son and
daughter between them show combination of four alleles ABCD at all four loci (A1, B1, C1, D1, etc.). (The father's fingerprint
is unknown). What
mother-offspring and sib-sib genetic combinations are possible?
Is there a rule by which the two patterns are genetically
distinguishable?
Group 8: The title of the
paper by Rothenberg et al. 2010
emphasizes that their detection system is "non-optical", which is
said to give more reliable results than conventional dideoxy-based
systems. Explain
non-optical sequence detection, and comment on its
accuracy relative to current automated sequencing.
All text material ©2012
by Steven M. Carr