=> The "Origin
of Species" is not really about the origin of species,
Natural Selection accounts for change within species (anagenesis)
How do we explain speciation (cladogenesis)?
Traditional classification is by degree
of geographic separation.
How does
reproductive isolation develop in a polytypic species?
RIMS =
Reproductive
Isolating Mechanisms
arise fortuitously, epistatically
SRMS =
Species
Recognition Mechanisms
arise by natural selection
Modern classification emphasizes population
genetic processes involved.
What genetic
changes occur during speciation?
Speciation by Allopatric Divergence
1. A widespread species is held together by gene flow
2. Gene flow is interrupted or reduced
isolation
by distance - limited vagility produces polytypic subspecies
extrinsic
barriers - physical barriers to gene flow
mountains, canyons, rivers, deserts,
etc.
vicariance
- populations move, or are moved apart
continental drift, land bridges, range expansion
change of watercourse, movement of glacier
3. Separated populations adapt to local
conditions
Populations
'track' different environments => they diverge biologically
Divergence
results in reproductive isolation
Pre-mating
reproductive isolation: failure to mate
Physical: no meeting, no mating
Ecological: Odocoileus spp. differ wrt microclimate
Seasonal: Angiosperm flowering times
differ on N / S cline
Temporal: Reproductive cycles triggered by day length
Ethological: divergence of mating behaviours
different flashing patterns among firefly
species (Lampyridae)
Post-mating
reproductive isolation: failure to mate successfully
Mechanical: 'lock and key' genitalia
in Insecta
Gamete incompatibility: no capacitation reaction between egg &
sperm
Hybrid inviability: failure of gastrulation during development
F1 sterility: female horse x male donkey => mule (v.v.
=> 'jenny')
F2 / B1 breakdown: white-crowned
sparrow (Zonotrichia) songs
4. Physical contact is re-established
Pre-mating
isolation may be sufficient to prevent mating
Character
Displacement= reproductive isolation 'exaggerated' in contact
'Indiscriminant' parents leave fewer offspring,
ability to discriminate reinforced by selection
Phlox species pink in allopatry; one spp. white in sympatry
Sitta nuthatches
have different bill sizes in sympatry
Post-mating
isolation may lead to 'dead end' hybridization
Hybrid
Sinks = hybrids found only in narrow zones bx species
Mus musculus & M. domesticus
meet & mate in Jutland: 100s yrs old
1. A widespread species, with physical
limits determined by 'adaptive limits'
["Goldilocks'
Rule": not too hot, too cold, too wet, too dry, etc.]
Occasional
opportunities in suitable habitat patches
2. Dispersers found new 'colonies' beyond
species' periphery
Colonies
are 'experiments', in new & different habitats
Most colonies
are unsuccessful: they fail or are resorbed
3. Founders may be successful because
of a "Genetic Revolution"
Bottleneck:
founders have small Ne, low H, non-random sample
of alleles
Drift
> Selection during first few generations, while Ne small
=> New
colony is genetically 'unique': may 'fix' new alleles at many loci
Isolation arises quickly & simultaneously for entire colony:
Pre-mating
isolation:
runaway sexual selection fixes new mating behaviour in colony
Hawai'ian
picture-wing
Drosophila
show aberrant morphotypes
Post-mating
isolation:
chromosome rearrangements become fixed in colony (inversions,
fissions, fusions)
Mutation may confer selective advantage
AR & CH vs.
ST
inversions
in Drosophila
Position Effect = expression of locus
is influenced
by change of physical location wrt other loci
Inversions are deleterious in heterokaryon
[heterokaryon =a chromosomal 'heterozygote';
cf. homokaryon]
Crossing-over in heterokayrons produces duplications / deletions
semi-sterile (W = 0.50) if these are unfit
Prob. of fixation of homokaryons greatly increased if
small Ne (Founder Effect):
drift fixes homokaryon by chance
high F (inbreeding) if founders
are related:
higher proportion of homokaryons produced.
4. Successful colony expands to fill habitat
patch, or contacts parental population.
#AB=1, #AA= 9 or 99, F= 0.0 or 0.50, W0 = 1.0, W1=0.5, W2=1.5
Speciation by Allopatric Divergence
is characteristic of 'typical' vertebrates
Mammals
(especially Carnivora) & birds
Look for ecogeographic, clinal subspecies
highly vagile, large Ne, K-selected, ecological
generalists
Martes shows western Palearctic -> eastern Nearctic size cline
Freshwater
fish:
waterfalls & shallows, watershed recaptures create barriers
Epicontinental
marine fishes:
N/S temperature gradients, river outflow
(Ex.: Gulf of St. Lawrence)
Biogeography
of
Nearctic
heavily influenced by Pleistocene Glaciations
Refugia in
BC islands, American SW & SE during Wisconsin
Ice (7-12,000 BP)
Newfoundland glaciated < 7,000 BP: Flemish Cap exposed
[E. C. Pielou, "After the Ice"]
Founder Effect speciation is characteristic
of two contrasting types
Vagile,
K-selected, generalists with potential for very small Ne
Successful colonies founded by 'families'
2 parents + 2 offspring is basic social unit
single gravid female
Primates, ungulates [Equidae, Cervidae], some herps
Did a "lemur on a log" colonize Madagascar?
Neotropical deer have extensive chromosome polymorphism
Non-vagile,
r-selected, specialists with very large R0
Successful colonies 'bounce back' from initial low N
Ex.: Drosophila
on
Hawai'ian kipukas (lava
islands)
Ex.: Guppies (Cyprinidontiformes) have internal fertilization
spawning is withheld until environment is right
Look for
peripheral & island isolates, chromosomal
complexes
In classical
diagrams (Divergence models), evolutionary change is
"slow & gradual":
10,000s ~ 1,000,000s of years
(Model
"B")
Process is (in principal) observable in fossil record
Rates of change are constant before, during, and after
speciation
Adaptation occurs continuously
=> Anagenesis produces all evolutionary change
In 'revisionist'
diagrams (Founder models), evolutionary change is
"rapid & punctuated": 100s ~ 1000s
of years (Model
"A")
"geologically instantaneous": not observable in fossil record
Adaptive divergence occurs only during speciation
Established lineages undergo no change
=> Cladogenesis produces all evolutionary change
Iconography
influences interpretation:
Mixed models ("A"
vs. "B" & "C" vs. "D") are possible
Parapatric speciation
(AKA
Stasipatricspeciation):
New colonies are founded within home range of parent species
Characteristic of species with extremely low vagility
Post-zygotic isolation arises simultaneously with entry to new niche
Case study: Israeli blind mole rat (Nannospalax
[Spalax] ehrenbergi)
[Nevo (1991). Evolutionary Biology 25:1-125].
1. Four chromosomal races:
2N
= 54
52
58
60
centric fusions
2. Environmental gradients in temperature, humidity, soil type
cold north
hot south
humid coast
arid inland
3. Very narrow hybrid zones
Deficiency of heterokaryons in hybrid sinks
4. Pre-zygotic ethological isolation
Chromosomal races have different olfactory, vocal signals,
Intraspecific aggression exaggerated between adjacent races
e.g., 52 / 58 meet aggressively, 54 / 58 less so
=> Incipient species:
Original cytogenetic differences are being reinforced
by adaptation to habitat & divergence of pre-mating RIMS
[Did chromosomal mutations 'cause' adaptive shifts?]
cf. Flightless Australian grasshoppers (Morabinae: Orthoptera) (M.J.D. White 1978)
Sympatric speciation
Habitat patches are sympatric: within "cruising range" of each other
Strong host / parasite interactions
host recognition has simple genetic basis
reproductive isolation precedes niche shift
A two-locus model:
Disruptive selection for host preference
(AA > A'A < A'A')
Assortative mating for mate preference
(BB > B'B < B'B')
=> two races, AABB & A'A'B'B' "meet & mate" in isolation
Case study: Apple
maggot (Rhagoletis pomonella) (Tephritidae) (Bush 1969)
1. A parasitoid of fruit
(related species on blueberry)
2. Host shifts from hawthorn
apple (1864)
cherry
(1960s)
3. Extremely limited vagility: "Meeting & Mating" on same piece
of fruit
Chemotaxis for host recognition
Mating, oviposition, diapause are
keyed to fruiting time
4. Primary mutation for host recognition
secondary mutations for host shifts
How common? Unlikely in vertebrates (50,000 spp.) because of vagility
But: > 500,000 species of parasitoid insects