Where
I'm coming from in Bio2250 - Principles of Genetics
Course
Philosophy
Genetics is
traditionally taught ’Peas first, DNA later'.
Facts and concepts are developed in the
same order in which they were discovered historically. Genetics courses were
taught for fifty years without any clear understanding
of the molecular nature of the gene. The ontogeny of most courses follows
this phylogeny. However,
a certain pretense is required: when we talk about round and wrinkled
peas, we
pretend you don't know about DNA, because Mendel didn't. This
approach
works well through the unraveling of the "Central Dogma" (DNA
makes RNA makes Protein)
in the early 1970s. In those days, we arrived
at an understanding of protein synthesis, and the end of the course,
simultaneously.
However, 2003 was the 50th
anniversary of the discovery of the structure of DNA, and the molecular revolution
in biology continues to accelerate. Genetics and molecular
biology have
proliferated in so many directions that a single introductory course
struggles to be comprehensive. Worse, there is an
ever-widening gap
between what can be taught and what is
required to
understand molecular genetics in 'general science' journals like "Science"
or
"Nature". Recent experiments in genomics
have become technically so involved that it is
difficult to present the complete logic, and we must skip to
summaries of
conclusions. How can the connection be made?
Bio2250 is taught "DNA first, peas
later". I reverse the traditional order. We begin with an
introduction to the
molecular biology of DNA structure and protein function, and build on
this foundation to introduce the behaviour of genes on chromosomes and
in crosses. A course that begins, "DNA is a
double-helix that is
replicated semi-conservatively...." (a
standing broad jump over 50 years of classical genetics) serves to
remind most students of material known in a general way at least
since high school. The logic of the classical
experiments
of Hershey & Chase, Watson & Crick, and Meselson
& Stahl, and others, is a valuable introduction to scientific
inference and
problem solving. It is not crucial to understanding
how DNA
functions. Likewise, it is necessary to understand in detail how the
Genetic
Code works, and less so to know how
Nirenberg & Khorana
figured it out
in the first place. An initial grounding in the processes of molecular
biology equips us to talk about current topics such as DNA
cloning, Genetic
Engineering, Biotechnology, and the Human Genome Project.
Selected
experiments are still analyzed in detail, to emphasize the
problem-solving
approach in genetics. Most of molecular genetics is doing in a test
tube what
goes on in a cell: if you understand nucleic acid structure, base
pairing
rules, polynucleotide directionality, and replication, you can
understand
vector insertion and molecular cloning. With such a background, and an
orientation to modern experimental techniques, I hope that the
course will
empower students to investigate further areas of individual interest.
THE DIFFERENCE IN
APPROACH MAY BE SUMMARIZED AS FOLLOWS.
The traditional method of teaching genetics is to understand phenotype in terms of genotype, and show the genotypic basis of phenotypes. The method of analyzing crosses is the traditional basis of "Genetics". That is, we teach that Peas have genes "for" alternative characteristics such as round vs wrinkled, or green vs yellow. In the same way, Humans have a gene "for" a genetic disease such as phenylketonuria. For each gene, we talk about in terms of one phenotype "dominating" another, and two alternative alleles being dominant or recessive. The nature of these alleles turns out to be due to variations the protein sequence, which is in turn a predictable consequence of particular changes in DNA sequences.
The modern method is to show how DNA genotypes
influence protein metabolic
pathways that produce characteristic phenotypes, the consequences of
mutations in DNA for
alteration of the outcomes of these pathways, and the interactions
of the alleles involved in terms of how they affect those
phenotypes. For example, we will see that in Peas, there
is a DNA segment that codes
for a Starch Branching Protein,
which when modified causes a loss of turgor pressure in seeds, and a "wrinkled" appearance. Similarly, in
Humans there is a gene that
codes for the enzyme Phenylalanine
Hydroxylase, that various alleles
of this gene
produce higher or lower levels of PAH,
and that
the biochemical interaction between the particular pair of alleles that
an individual has inherited determines whether or not that individual
manifests a disease called "Phenylketonuria".
We understand "dominant" and "recessive" as
descriptions of a phenotype
that is a consequence of a molecular genotype
involving
DNA and protein, rather than intrinstic
properties of bead-like genes on a string. The use of molecular biology
to understand the flow of information from DNA to protein to phenotype is
sometimes called "Reverse Genetics"
.
The Social Contract
1. I expect that all students will attend
all lectures.
Exams are based on lecture
material, not on the text.
Other courses in Genetics at Memorial:
Population
genetics
is covered in Bio
2900
(Principles of Evolution & Systematics),
another course in the core curriculum. My
own research
is
an application of molecular genetics to evolutionary biology. You'll
hear more
about this later.
Molecular
Biology of
Nucleic Acids is covered in Biochemistry 3107
(Dr.
Mulligan), which goes into greater depth on some of these same topics,
from the
perspective of a biochemist. Courses in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Gene
Regulation are also taught through Biochemistry.
Advanced
Genetics (Bio4241)
is typically offered in alternate years.
This course considers classic and current genetics experiments in
detail, and cover additional topics (eg, Immunogenetics, Cancer
Genetics, Quantitative Genetics, Developmental Genetics) in greater
detail.
Text material © 2009 by Steven M. Carr