Embryonic structures have acquired new functions during evolution
Embryo's development reflects the evolutionary history of the organism.
New anatomical structures arise from existing
structures.
The mammalian inner ear has 3 bones to transmit
sound from the ear drum
Reptilian ancestral jaw attaches to skull
via articular (jaw) bone and quadrate (skull) bone which transmit sound.
In mammals, the articular and quadrate bones have been modified into
the malleus and incus bones of the inner ear
Limbs evolved from fins
Limbs develop after the phylotypic stage
and evolved from the pelvic and pectoral fins of fish-like ancestors.
The limb pattern is highly conserved although differences exist.
Fin buds are similar to limb buds.
Proximal elements are similar but distal
bony fin rays differ greatly from tetrapod limb.
Early hedgehog and Hox expression is similar but additional Hox gene
expression in the distal limb bud leads to digits.
This may due to extension of cartilage forming region plus novel Hox
gene patterning.
Development of vertebrate and insect wings makes use of evolutionary
conserved mechanisms
Insect and bird wings are very different (two layers of epithelia versus
mesenchymal core cover by ectoderm.
However, these wings (and vertebrate limbs) share
signaling molecules.
Antero-posterior axis require hedgehog-like genes and TGFB (dpp &
BMP-2)
Dorsal structures require apterous-like genes' Dorsal/venral boundaries
require fringe family members.
Establishment of axes and patterning require a small set of conserved
genes.
Hox genes complexes have evolved through gene duplication
Tandem gene duplication can allow retention of gene while new functions
are adopted by one copy.
Hox gene (homeobox, helix-turn-helix transcription factor) cluster
arose from rounds of tandem duplication.
Vertebrates have four Hoxgene complexes.
Amphioxus, a vertebrate-like chordate, has one Hox cluster which may
be close to ancestral Hox complex.
Each vertebrate cluster seems to arose from chromosomal duplication
of arrays generated by tandem duplication.
Some mammalian Hox genes (Clusters a-d, 10-13) not present in arthropods,
seem to be products of tandem duplication before chromosomal duplication.
Changes in specification and interpretation of positional identity
have generated the elaboration of vertebrate and arthropod body plans
Hox genes control A/P axis of embryo.
The zootype is the expression of key genes along the A/P axis of the
embryo.
Hox genes specify positional identity not a specific structure.
Different species of embryos interpret the values differently.
Changes in downstream targets of the Hox genes provide source of change.
Vertebrate number differences among some birds depend upon the spatial
expression of Hoxc6.
In insects and crustaceans, the pattern of Hox gene expression is very
different and the differences in body plan are the result.
The position and number of paired appendages in insects is dependent
on Hox gene expression
The pattern of Hox gene expression along the A/P axis is conserved
among insects.
Some have abdominal legs, some only one pair of wings.
Repression of Distal-less by Bithorax Complex (BXC) genes in the abdomen
of Drosophila suppress limb formation.
The Hox genes can determine nature of the appendage.
Rather than new genes, new regulation relationships between BXC genes
evolved to control limb and wing devekopment.
The body plan of arthropods and vertebrates is different
Despite similarities, vertebrates have an inverted
dorso-ventral axis compared to arthropods.
The nerve cord is ventral in arthropods and dorsal in vertebrates.
Inversion may be directed by the position of the mouth which is specified
during gastrulation.
Two related groups of proteins, chordin & sog and BMP-4 & dpp
have conserved functions but result in inverted axes.
engrailed and hairy have similar roles in the Drosophila parasegments
and vertebrate somites.
Changes in relative growth rates can alter the shapes of organisms.
The timing of growth leads to differences between related organisms.
Dogs have different face shapes due to relative difference in nose
and jaw growth
In evolution of the horse, the central digit
grew faster and longer than the others.
Once the digits were no longer touching the ground, a second event
further reduced the size of the lateral digits.
Allometry is the mathematical analysis of
the relative growth of various parts of an organism.
The timing of developmental events has changed during evolution
If the timing of developmental events differ from the ancestral, great
effects can occur.
Heterochrony describes a difference in the
timing of growth and development between organisms.
For example, acquiring sexual maturity at an immature stage or neoteny,
arises from heterchronic changes.
Direct developing frogs (i.e Eleutherodactylus)
do not undergo a tadpole stage and display accelerated development of adult
structures.
Reduction/loss of limbs in whales and flightless birds reflect a change
in timing of developmentally significant activities.
email me at bestave@mun.ca