Flora of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

S.G. Aiken, M.J. Dallwitz, L.L. Consaul, C.L. McJannet, L.J. Gillespie, R.L. Boles, G.W. Argus, J.M. Gillett, P.J. Scott, R. Elven, M.C. LeBlanc, A.K. Brysting and H. Solstad


Lycopodiaceae

Club-moss family.

Lycopodiaceae, club-moss family.

Vegetative morphology. Plants perennial herbs; (1–)2–14 cm high; caespitose, or not caespitose; low, moss-like, and evergreen, in tufts, or with long ground-level stems. Roots pallid-brown. Ground-level or under-ground stems horizontal, or not developed horizontally or vertically; rhizomatous, or stoloniferous (or not applicable); elongate (when present); 0.5–3 mm wide. Scales absent. Aerial stems erect; circular or oval in cross-section, or squarish; with 0 ridges, or 4 ridges. Leaves distributed along the stems; alternate (that contrasts with the Equisetaceae); evergreen. Petioles absent. Leaf blade bases truncate, or acute. Blades 0.2–3.5 mm long. Blades appressed to the stem; straight, or somewhat curled; linear, or elliptic, or triangular; with inconspicuous veins.

Reproductive morphology. Plants with sporangia, or with gemmae. Sporangia in the axils of unmodified leaves (Huperzia), or in terminal cone-like structures.

Notes. The Lycopodiaceae s.l. are an ancient and probably monophyletic family without close living relatives. The family has a virtually cosmopolitan distribution. Estimates of the number of species range from approximately 200 to more than 500 (Ǿllgaard, 1987). Porsild placed all the taxa found in the eastern Canadian Arctic Archipelago in genus Lycopodium. Extensive research since then has lead to several revised classifications of the family.
Ǿllgaard (1987) provided information on: branching patterns, cortex and stelar anatomy, distribution of mucilage cavities, leaf differention, morphology of sporophylls, sporangia, spores, gametophytes, chromosome numbers, and phytochemistry to reach the revised classification of the Lycopodiaceae he proposed.
Wagner (1992) discussed cytological problems in Lycopodium s.l. pointing out that the most important distinction between members of the family and seed plants has to do with fertilization. The gametes involved in "selfing" in seed plants arise from two different recombinant products of meiosis and, therefore, selfing does not often produce homozygous offspring. On the other hand, members of the Lycopodiaceae and Equisetaceae have the capacity to produce completely homozygous offspring since a gametophyte and its gametes are produced from a single haploid spore. This is referred to as intragametophytic selfing.
Wagner and Beitel (1992), provided a generic classification of modern North American Lycopodiaceae based on 50 characters of anatomy, chromosomes, spores and gametophytes and analysed the data gathered using his ground-plan-divergence method of cladistics (Wagner 1980). Wagner and Beitel (1992) justified segregating taxa previously treated as being in the genus Lycopodium,finding that the groups they recognized as separate genera have many distinguishing features with strong gaps that separate them from each other. These features include monophylesis, uniquely derived states, inability to hybridize, and a level of segregation consistent and comparable with generic divisions in other Pteridophytes.
Wagner and Beitel (1992) were aware of the work of Josef Holub and Benjamin Ǿllgaard and recognized that both had made extensive contributions to the knowledge and understanding of the family including providing two systems of classification (Holub, 1983 and Ǿllgaard, 1987). All three authors provide extensive references to the earlier work on the Lycopodiaceae. While Wagner and Beitel (1992) limited their work to North American members of the family they were aware that the classification they proposed was closer to the ranks proposed by Holub (1983). A modified version of a key to the genera for the three genera recognized in the eastern Canadian Arctic follows based on Wagner and Beitel (1992).
1a. Sporophylls like other leaves, photosynthetic; plants
epiphytic or terrestrial; roots running from the apex
through the cortex before emerging; leaves lacking
mucilageastern Canadaals; rhizomes absent; spores
foveolate-fossulate; chromosomes x = 67–68. Sub-family Huperzioideae
Plants producing specialized lateral bulbils (gemmiphores and gemmae);
gametophytes unbranched; spore angles truncate, spore sides concave;
.................................................................. Genus Huperzia Bernh.
1b. Sporophylls more or less strongly modified, unlike other leaves,
nonphotosynthetic at maturity; plants terrestrial or
semiaquatic; leaves with basal mucilageastern Canadaals; roots emerging
immediately, scattered along the rhizomes; spores various
but not foveolate-fossulate .............................................Subfamily Lycopodioideae
2a. Shoots round-branched, the mature leaves monomorphic and separate,
in 6–8 ranks; sporangial wall cells with invaginations and evanginations;
gametophytes gray or brown, flat, button-like and convoluted when
mature; chromosomes x = 34.......................Genus Lycopodium L.
2b. Shoots flat-branched, the leaves mostly dimorphic or trimorphic
and overlapping; sporangial wall cells smoothly sinuate; gametophytes
orange pigmented, narrowly top-shaped, nonconvoluted;
chromosomes x = 23, flat-branched clubmosses......Genus Diaphasiastrum Holub.

Illustrations. • Lycopodiaceae: club-mosses. Family has sporangia borne in cones or, as in this case, the axils of unspecialized leaves. • Lycopodiaceae: young cone. Left, young fertile stobilus, or cone-like organ, with yellow sporangia just visible in the axils of the lower sporophylls. Right, sterile stem that has longer leaves. • Lycopodiaceae: old cones. Cone-like strobili that has opened to reveal sporangia borne in the axils of the leaves.


Cite this publication as: ‘S.G. Aiken, M.J. Dallwitz, L.L. Consaul, C.L. McJannet, L.J. Gillespie, R.L. Boles, G.W. Argus, J.M. Gillett, P.J. Scott, R. Elven, M.C. LeBlanc, A.K. Brysting and H. Solstad. 1999 onwards. Flora of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: Descriptions, Illustrations, Identification, and Information Retrieval. Version: 29th April 2003. http://www.mun.ca/biology/delta/arcticf/’. Dallwitz (1980) and Dallwitz, Paine and Zurcher (1993, 1995, 2000) should also be cited (see References).

Index